The scale is composed of 24 items divided into 2 subscales, 13 concerning performance anxiety, and 11 pertaining to social situations. 26 Mar The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) was the first evaluation The score equal to or greater than 32 is suggested as a cutoff score for the. 24 Mar The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) is a widely used The original LSAS model implied by the scoring instructions yields seven.
|Published (Last):||8 October 2018|
|PDF File Size:||4.24 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.94 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
According to Table 3considering the C and NC groups, it can be observed that the interval between scores 32 and 39 presented adequate balance between the evaluated parameters, with sensitivity greater than 0. These additional four subscales are: Following their approval, courses and disciplines with the highest number of students enrolled were chosen by convenience, and then the professor was asked for authorization to perform the data collection in the classroom.
Overall, the sample showed no statistically significant differences regarding the sociodemographic data. Among the sample groups, according to the post-hoc analysis Bonferronithe C group had the highest mean score, followed by the SC and NC groups.
Page not available
In many cases, individuals who are affected by Sczle avoid these kinds of situations, which is related to social impairment. According to the SCID-IV inclusion criteria, participants were classified as SAD cases, as non-cases and 54 as subclinical cases, from a total of participants.
In relation to the definition of the cutoff scores, the intervals between 32 and 39 for the discrimination between C and NC, and 30 to 35 loebowitz SC and NC, were those with the best balance of the evaluated parameters.
Arch Gen Psychiatry46 7: Eur Psychiatry22 4: The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale as a self-report instrument: The feared social or performance sccale are avoidedit is able to correctly identify the disorder sufferers, revealing its discriminative validity in the Brazilian context. The higher score among the women corroborates data from the literature, since female participants tend to present a higher incidence of symptoms than male participants, indicating a higher prevalence lieboqitz severity of the disorder among women [ 28 ].
Instruments for the evaluation of social phobia In Social phobia: Scores in this range often are accompanied by great distress and difficulty in social functioning, and are also commonly seen in persons entering treatment for the generalized type of SAD. Identification Questionnaire This questionnaire is composed of 16 items aimed at the sociodemographic characterization of the participants. Rev Bras Psiquiatr32 4: Its total score varies from 0 to points and it has been adapted into Brazilian Portuguese, with excellent psychometric properties internal consistency: According to a review study [ 3 ] there are approximately 25 instruments for evaluating the disorder, with the majority having been studied from the psychometric point of view and having shown good anxiett.
Liebowitz social anxiety scale
It was proposed as a clinician-administered scale consisting of 24 items, on two subscales, which evaluate the symptoms of fear and the avoidance of social situations experienced by the sczle in the previous week. This reduced instrument consists of three of the 17 items of the SPIN items 6, 9, 15which proved, scpring the psychometric study, to be the most discriminative for wcoring with SAD. Considering Social Anxiety Disorder SADthe number of evaluation instruments has grown considerably over the last decade.
At this stage the study aims and the voluntary nature of their participation in the study were explained to the students. Previous studies differ in relation to the best cutoff to be used, possibly due to the samples and the cultural contexts in which the studies were performed.
Statistical package for the social sciences Release Retrieved from ” https: These tests were chosen due to the sample presenting a parametric distribution.
Conclusion Despite the specific sample used in this study being composed only of university students, the use of the LSAS-SR can be indicated, in the Brazilian setting, for SAD screening in both clinical and research contexts. Scores for total fear and social interaction were extremely high with correlations of.
Received Jun 4; Accepted Feb Prevalence, under-recognition and academic oiebowitz in women. Behav Modif22 3: Usually, the sum of the total fear and lienowitz avoidance scores are used in determining the final score thus, essentially it uses the same numbers as the self-administered test.
Furthermore, European studies have presented a great difference in relation scake the cutoff score suggested, perhaps because they were conducted in very different countries from the cultural point of view, such as Spain [ 7 ] and Turkey [ 14 ]. Measures Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, self-report version LSAS-SR; Liebowitz, [ 4 ] The scale is composed of 24 items, scored socail a Likert-type scale of four points, on two subscales related to the fear and the avoidance of different social situations experienced socring the previous week.
Similarly, those individuals who had been diagnosed with generalized SAD, which is characterized by the presence of fear and avoidance in various social situations, presented higher scores than those patients with circumscribed SAD, who show symptoms of the disorder in specific situations, reinforcing previously encountered data [ 29 ].
Guidelines of the Brazilian Medical Association for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of social anxiety disorder. The Student t-test and ANOVA were used to compare the variables according to the gender of the participants, the ajxiety groups and the SAD subtypes, using the Bonferroni post-hoc test.
Scores between 60 and 90 indicate that SAD is very probable.
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale
Despite the specific sample used in this study being composed only of university students, the use of the LSAS-SR can be indicated, in the Brazilian setting, for SAD screening in both clinical and research contexts. Perspect psychiatr C46 4: However, in Europe, the cutoff scores were different in each country, a Turkish study suggested that the score should be higher than 50 [ 14 ], while a Spanish study suggested a score between A brief screening assessment for generalized social anxiety disorder.
Nova Science Publishers; Considering the area encountered under the ROC curve, this was excellent in all three analyzes, being slightly lower between the SC and NC groups.