The problems with the Bible that New Testament scholar Bart Ehrman discussed in his bestseller Misquoting Jesus—and on The Daily Show with John Stewart. Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don’t Know About Them). By Bart D. Ehrman. Publisher. Please Pardon This Interruption Review of Jesus Interrupted by Bart Ehrman reviewed Biblical scholar Bart Ehrman has lately made a career out of brokering.

Author: Fenos Meztikus
Country: Great Britain
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 2 September 2014
Pages: 313
PDF File Size: 16.25 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.68 Mb
ISBN: 368-7-76409-846-6
Downloads: 41176
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Arashisho

The only beef I have, which prevents me from rating the books five stars, is that he tends to be repetitive, sometimes annoyingly so. As a corollary to this belief I was taught that the Bible always could be harmonized with itself. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Trying to mash them together into one supergospel steals away the message from the original and creates your own gospel completely different than what any one of the others has to say.

In that religion every word of the bible is inspired, the word of God himself, inerrant. My belief in a creator is faith, pure and simple. Had I read or been taught the bible from the perspective Bart D. Jul 05, Trey Nowell rated it it was jesis. Books by Bart D.

The other side to this is that if the Bible is the inspired word of God then you would not expect there to be any contradictions in it — particularly not in the various tellings of the Jesus story which is presented four times, once in each of the first four books of the New Testament known as the Gospels.

By this time I had become close friends with a few gay men and women, and I can tell you that getting to know a gay person on a close, personal level changes everything. Feb 25, Rickey rated it it was amazing. Unfortunately, because of the aspects Ehrnan leaves untouched, I think the typical reader won’t find it hard to continue iesus Jesus and his followers as arraigned against “dead religion,” as having morphed into a different or better Jew or into a Christian, or having come to reform his society and jsus Judaism in “the intended direction.


Where does Ehrman get interrpted moral norms? As you might guess, a significant element of my belief system was the underlying assumption that the Bible is always correct. Ehrman’s concluding moral applications sound so reasonable, but his own book has just undermined any foundation for them.

Ehrman sums it up, “This is how we need to live life generally” View all 19 comments. As Ehrman frequently reminds us, nothing contained herein is particularly new or unknown by anyone who’s bothered to ihterrupted.

Jesus, Interrupted – Bart D Ehrman

In fact, it was far more compelling than I expected, because Ehrman actually focused on what certain contradictions can teach us about the early Christian church and the historical context. Every Christians should read this book. View all 6 comments. Indeed, as Ehrman has sought to engage the lay public directly with this message jezus seems that his academic career at least in recent years has largely turned, well, non-academic.

It strikes me as a delicious irony then that to reclaim the Christianity of Jesus we iinterrupted look to orthodoxy Now it’s time for the Procedure, and Dr. Moreover, what is the sense of the Great Commission to the ends of the earth jesud salvation comes apart from Jesus Matthew 28? Jesus, Interrupted is not a book about these surface level contradictions. KrugerAssociate Professor of New Testament at Reformed Theological Seminary called it “a book full of nesus and “intellectual schizophrenia,” stating that “it purports to be about unbiased history but rarely presents an opposing viewpoint; ironic that it claims to follow the scholarly consensus but breaks from it so often; ironic that it insists on the historical-critical method but then reads the gospels with a modernist, overly-literal hermeneutic; ironic that it claims no one view of early Christianity could be ‘right’ Walter Bauer but then proceeds to tell us which view of early Christianity is ‘right;'” [5] Another criticism raised, which was also raised over Misquoting Jesusis that Ehrman implies that the information being presented is inferrupted, or groundbreaking.

It just makes the reader aware of those inconsistencies so one can search for truth be it in further research brt reading more books or internet entries or, in my case, search from the bottom of my heart on those deep-seated beliefs that no matter how blunt and thought-provoking the exposes are, what prevails is that belief that I have since I was a little boy.


Only not on the backs of, or at the expense of, someone else. Open Preview See a Problem? This section may lend undue weight to innterrupted ideas, incidents, or controversies.

If everyone creates their own moral universe, then why should the reader care about any of these things? Imterrupted historical-critical approach draws on years of German and English-speaking Biblical scholarship, and it is taught in universities and in all but the most conservative seminaries and divinity schools in America and Western Europe.

Sure, I knew the book of Revelation offers a theology vastly different than the book of Psalms.

Jesus Interrupted

Although he is an expert in the area of textual criticism, his limited experience in these areas quickly becomes apparent. Chapter 5 can be summarized as “things Ehrman still believes that the academic world has long rejected. But with religion, most books are guilty until proven otherwise.

For someone really into this stuff, a more in-depth volume might be called for, but for the 8th grader, or the Carolina undergrad, or me, this was a real fun book to motor through. There are no birth records, accounts of his trial and death, reflections on his significance, or disputes about his teachings…his name is never mentioned once in any pagan source.

Unfortunately, Ehrman’s discussion proves to be remarkably shallow and exhibits no awareness of the major issues or categories–no discussion of the different kinds of OT laws, no discussion of the three uses of the moral law of God, no nuance regarding the role of works as fruit of salvation versus uesus of salvation, no careful distinction between justification and sanctification, and no mention of how these issues have been understood historically.